|
The Weil Perspective
Managing Successful Transitions from Work to Retirement
By James Weil, Managing Director – Successful Aging
If Paul Revere were alive today he'd be riding through corporate America
shouting, “The retirements are coming! The retirements are coming!”
In just four years, the leading edge of the “baby boomers” will turn age
62, the average age of retirement for men. (The average age of retirement for women is 63.)
Once this happens, every seven seconds another American will turn 62 and likely begin the
transition to the next chapter of life.
There are two polar points of view of this phenomenon:
|
|
|
| |
1) |
The conventional paradigm: Companies can't wait to get rid of
their older workers because they are liabilities from productivity and cost standpoints.
And employees can't wait to retire so they can spend the rest of their days in Florida
playing golf, fishing, gardening, traveling, and spoiling their grandchildren. Retirement
means good riddance from both parties' points of view.
|
| |
2) |
The new paradigm: Employers should view their older workforce
as a valuable asset that can be leveraged as contingent workers, ambassadors, mentors,
and lobbyists. Older workers are experienced and dependable and many have no intention
of retiring to the golf course. (In fact, only two percent of U.S. retirees play golf.)
They want to go on leading stimulating and fulfilling lives. |
Unfortunately, the first paradigm remains dominant in many organizations
but savvy employers are quickly embracing the new paradigm. Why? The facts tell the story
quite compellingly.
On the employee (“supply”) side of the labor market equation:
| |
 |
AARP surveys have shown that 69 percent of boomers plan to work
in some capacity during their “retirement.”
|
| |
 |
34 percent will work primarily for enjoyment, while only 19 percent
will do so because they feel they need the money.
|
| |
 |
75 percent want to pursue their dreams and learn something new
in “retirement.” |
This translates to a strong supply of experienced workers who are ready
to engage in new challenges with excitement and enthusiasm. In contrast, how many younger
workers are anxious to report to their jobs each morning?
On the employer (“demand”) side of the equation:
| |
 |
The 79 million boomers will be followed by 45 million Generation
Xers, which means a great reduction in the traditional labor pool.
|
| |
 |
In this decade alone, the 25-44 year old population will decline
by 4.3 million individuals while the 45-64 year old population will increase by 16 million.
|
| |
 |
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that within the
next seven years there will be a shortfall of 10 million workers in the United States. |
So what's an employer to do? First, assess where your organization stands
with regard to workforce demographics by answering the following questions. How do your
employees break out by age and job type? Where are you most at risk of losing key older
employees? What skills, institutional knowledge and crucial relationships will be lost if
a large segment of your older workers retires? What planning must be done to pass along
critical skills and knowledge? Do you need formal mentoring and succession management programs?
The next step for your organization should be to create a plan for transitioning
employees into retirement. This plan should take both parties' needs into account. What
does your organization want, need and value in terms of its workforce? What do your older
workers want, need and value in terms of their future? Where are the gaps and what are the
solutions?
For many organizations, phased retirement programs will be a logical and
effective means to achieve a win-win solution. Employers get to retain key individuals longer
than they might otherwise, and succession planning becomes considerably easier to implement.
Ultratech, Inc., CIGNA, and Monsanto all have successful phased retirement programs in place
that allow employees to move from full-time to part-time and temporary status. Naturally,
there are a number of details that have to be ironed out to make these programs work (e.g.,
regulatory requirements of the IRS and ADEA) but they're worth the effort due to the extraordinary
benefits they bring at a small cost.
One of the main benefits, of course, is that these employees can be used
as a “contingent workforce.” After all, they know and understand the organization and how
it works, they want to work, and they're a known quantity
to managementall of which makes them a much better option than temporary workers from
an agency. Proctor and Gamble and Eli Lily formed a “talent bank” of retirees to use for
special projects. These programs are young but seem to be very successful for all parties.
Older workers also can be leveraged as ambassadors. For example, Sears uses
retirees to help open new stores. Chevron Texaco Corporation retirees help with letter-writing
campaigns and regulatory developments.
Indeed, “the retirements are coming”
and quickly. Plan now and you
can reap the rewards later.
|